Сетх - это не ОН и не ОНА. Это ОНО. Может оно само тварь?

Мне тоже так кажется. Он же теперь заменяет нам мать, обязан и кормить детей-земли тогда. Раз бог без богини то её самые важные функции вынужден брать себе, как бы он этого сам не хотел. Молоко первая пища, но его молоко яд. С молоком матери...

Канонический знак-символ Сатурна - серп или коса смерти

Является ли Сатурн Сетхом?

На новогодней картинке был Сатурн а не Сетх, я к этому написал.

Ulis,

you interpretation of Hathor is pretentiously wrong and misleading. As a matter of fact, I read a lot of your articles (I liked most of them) and found out that many word definitions you give in you rather brilliant explanations are based on Judeo-Masonic teachings interwoven with Hermetism and partially Rosicrucianism (Cosmoc Kristos, etc). I wanted to object slightly that you cannot interpret the meaning of "Hathor" using modern "Ek-Gipto-Russian" neuro-lingual container "ХатХор" as "...это Хата, Дом, точный перевод - Дом Гора. ХатХор, она же Нут, ее персонификация на Земле - Исида..." This is typical Judeo-Masonic "verbal artificial matrix" or in Russian would be called simply "словоблудие".

The definition of the neuro-lingual container of "HATHOR" has really nothing to do with Judeo-Masonic-Hermetic-Rosicrucian and Ek-Gipto-Russian modern nonsense:

THE MAIN GODDESS OF ARYAN CULTURE BEFORE EGYPT (PRE-DYNASTIC PHARAONIC EGYPT)WAS AN ARYAN GODDESS-MOTHER MAKOSH (please note - not Semitic Torahic LILITH as one use noted before in the same thread).

The ARYAN word МАКОШЬ (as you see words defines who were Aryans) was transliterated later into Khemetic MEHET (correct pronunciation MEHETH, where letter [K] in SLAVIC ARYAN MAKOSH was transformed into letter [H] and Slavic Aryan [SH] into [TH] and later became to sound like and to be a "KHEMETIC MEHET". EGYPTIAN MEHET (HATHOR) is a SLAVIC ARYAN [VEDIC] GODDESS MEKETH (МАКОШЬ).

Later on IN DYNASTIC EGYPT THE IDENTITY OF MAKOSH WAS DIVIDED INTO MA & HOSH. MA BECAME TO BE KNOWN AS MA'AT (МАТЬ) and KOSH or HOTH, where neuro-lingual container of KOSH transliterated (mutated) into "HOSH" that sounded identical as "HATH". Ending OR used to be HATH-HORS, where the second word "HORS" simply means Slavic Aryan "god" HORS (ХОРС). With the simplification of double word HATH-HORS it became to be "HATHOR", what really means THE MOTHER OF HORS. The Egyptian HORUS is later invented Judeo-Semitic nonsense about so called HORUS, exactly the same as artificial invention of "SETH" and the whole pantheon of "Egyptian" gods. In reality there were not "Egyptian" gods, - it is all Osirian-Mosaic and laterr followed up Semitic artificial invention - ALL OF IT. Remeber, all Egyptian gods came from Aryanism, more over almost all Egyptian names of so called "gods" came from Slavic language, which in reality is current perverted amd modernized RUSSIAN. SLAVIC WAS THAT ONE LANGUAGE OF HUMANITY ABOUT WHICH SEMITIC DEITY IS BRAGGING IN Genesis 11:7 "...Let us go down and mix up their language so that they will not understand each other."

MAKOSH (HATHOR) IS THE OLDEST GODDESS IN THE UNIVERSE THAT VEDIC ARYANS BROUGHT TO THE AREA WHERE THEY ESTABLISHED KHEMET (EGYPT) in ~26,000 BC. Later on Hathor became to be ASHERA, CONSORT OF BAAL (ВЕЛЕС) and LATER HEBREW "CYCLE" called YHWH (note that YHWH IS NOT A GOD, but cycle, simply cosmic cycle...).

In Egyptian mythology, Hathor (Egyptian for House of Horus, but correctly THE MOTHER OF HORS or HORUS [МАТЬ ХОРСА]) was originally a personification of the Milky Way (Mehet-Weret), in Slavic Aryan МАКОШЬ-СВАРГА-СВАРА-ВЕРЕТ (represented as SYMBOL OF MILKY WAY - SWASTIKA WITH FOUR SLEEVES), which was seen as the milk that flowed from the udders of a heavenly cow (Slavic Aryan ZIMUN COW (КОРОВА ЗИМУН) creating four galactic sleeves.

Hathor, an an ancient SLAVIC GODDES MAKOSH (note again - NOT SEMITIC LILITH), worshiped as a cow-deity from ~31000 BC, known to us as "HATHOR" from at least 2700 BC, during the 2nd dynasty, and even by the Scorpion King. The name Hathor refers to the encirclement by her, in the form of the Milky Way, of the night sky and consequently of the god of the sky, Horus (Slavic Aryan god HORS [ХОРС]). She was originally seen as the daughter of Ra (РаМХа), the creator whose own cosmic birth was formalized as the Ogdoad cosmogony. An alternate name for her, which persisted for at least 3,000 years, was Mehturt (also spelled Mehurt 9Mother of Hors), Mehet-Weret, and Mehet-uret), meaning great flood, a direct reference to her being the Milky Way (SWARA). The Milky Way was seen as a waterway in the heavens, sailed upon by both the sun god and the king, leading the Egyptians to describe it as The Nile in the Sky. Due to this, and the name Mehturt, she was identified as responsible for the yearly inundation of the Nile. Another consequence of this name is that she was seen as a herald of imminent birth, as when the amniotic sac breaks and floods its waters, it is a medical indicator that the child is due to be born extremely soon. HATHOR (MAKOSH) was the Goddess of Motherhood. As a provider of milk, and due to cows careful tending of their calves, the cow was a universal symbol of motherhood, and so Hathor became goddess of motherhood, gaining titles such as 'The Great Cow Who Protects Her Child' and 'Mistress of the Sanctuary of Women.' Because of the aspect of motherhood, her priests were oracles, predicting the fate of the newborn, and midwives delivering them. As a mother, since she enclosed the sky, she was seen as the mother of Horus. Symbolically she became the divine mother of the pharaoh, who was identified as Horus. Since Horus's wife was Isis, Hathor was sometimes said to be her mother, although it was more accurate to say she was her mother in law. As Horus was also said to be the son of Ra, Hathor was identified as Ra's wife (Ra created her in a non-sexual manner), gaining the title Mistress of Heaven. Having been identified as Ra's wife, it was said she arose from Ra's tears, and thus was identified as the Eye of Ra. In art, Hathor was often depicted as a golden cow (sometimes covered in stars), with the titles Cow of Gold, and The one who shines like gold, or as a woman with the ears of a cow and a headdress of horns holding the sun-disc, which represented Ra. Hathor was identified as the Pleiades. Also HATHOR (MAKOSH) was a Fertility Goddess. The cow's large eyes with long lashes and generally quiet demeanor were often considered to suggest a gentle aspect of feminine beauty. There are still cultures in the world where to say that a girl is as pretty as a heifer is a great compliment, rather than taking you cow as an insult.

And so Hathor rapidly became a goddess of beauty, and fertility, thus also a patron goddess for lovers. A tale grew up around this in which Ra is described as having been upset over Horus' victory over Set (representing the conquest of Lower Egypt by Upper Egypt), and went off to be alone, and so Hathor went to him and started to dance and stripped naked, showing him her genitals, which cheered him up, so he returned. The tale is thought also to describe a solar eclipse, as it depicts Ra, the sun, going away to sulk, and then returning when cheered up. In her position as a female fertility goddess, who readily strips naked, she was often depicted in red, the color of passion, though her sacred color is turquoise, and so gained the titles Lady of the scarlet-colored garment, and Lady of sexual offerings (Nebet Hetepet in Egyptian). This also is what ARYAN VEDIC KAMA-SUTRA meant - KAMA-SUTRA OF MAKOSH-HATHOR which was was brought to Egypt by Vedic Aryans, who in their right were siply SLAVS OR SLAVIC PEOPLE.

P.S.
"...at the beginning was WORD and THE WORD was..."GODS" [plural, but not Semitic Elohim]. Words (and neuro-lingual containers preserved in them) are THE ONLY KEY to understand the true history of humanity, all other paradigms as BIBLE, QUR'AN, TORAH-TANACH, ZOHAR, etc with consequent teachings which sprang from all of them are ARTIFICIALLY CREATED HOLOGRAPHIC MATRIX. This is why Saurian entities [plural] behind Semitic Tetragrammaton YHWH said in Genesis 11:7  "...Let us go down and mix up their language so that they will not understand each other."

Saurians knew what they were doing...

Frankenstein.

Ulis, Сет (настоящий, реально-существовавший Сет) действительно был братом Осириса, и одним из последних сохранившихся чистокровных Атлантов. В той легенде про Сета и Осириса куда больше правды, чем может показаться.
И Сет действительно убил Осириса, с целью захватить престол, а потом воевал и со своим племянником Гором. Гор - был последним Атлантом правившим в Египте; после его смерти наступил додинастический период, а через некоторое время воцарился фараон из 1династии, считавший себя и являвшийся(предположительно) потомком Гора.
При этом Сет и др.Атланты Египта были довольно-сильными Магами, благодаря чему достигли высокого статуса и силы/власти в поссмертии.  Именно поэтому египтяне и провозгласили Атлантов, своих бывших правителей, богами.
Источник доверенный, посему уверен в этой версии на 90%.
Однако твоя версия, якобы Сет и ветхозаветный Бог - являются одной и той же личностью, на мой взгляд крайне сомнительна. Слишком отличаются описание и деяния этих 2героев, не меньше отличается и культ Сета от ветхозаветного иудаизма. Это 2 разные личности, 99% гарантии.

Ulis,

There is one request from me, - call me "Ты", it would be much easier for me to feel "at home" on your forum... By the way, I am little sorry to communicate in English, it feels not easy knowing that other members of the forum have to read our communication in English. I promise I will start to use "Russian" keyboard and write in Russian if it will be necessary to continue to be on the forum...

Meanwhile, I am finishing to read your commentary and explanation of A. Pushkin's "Ruslan & Ludmila". I should mention that I've been already pretty familiar with the esoteric interpretations of A.P's work for quite some time. In addition I do agree that A.P's genius could come from the collective Akashic records "library" which became to be the “The ASHTAR Saurian Collective” (I assume you know what I mean). Nevertheless, there is a plenty of information which suggest that above mentioned "library" is controlled also and IS NOT COMPLETELY CLEAN, thus cannot be considered as 100% REAL VALUE of its given information. I also know that the history of HYPERBOREA IS CONCEALED IN NUMEROUS WORKS OF RUSSIAN WRITERS AND POETS, where A. PUSHKIN NAMED AS ONE OF THEM.

In any case, after finishing analyzing your notes on "Ruslan & Ludmila" I will post my thought in regards to the issue of Seth being an artificially created Judeo-Masonic "archetype"...to conceal the real entity behind Tetragrammaton and to break the search beam of anyone who will make attempt to find out the real information about identity of Hebrew "god". It is suffice to say here that studying Hermetism [Hermeticism], especially "teachings" of Thoth/Hermes Trismegistus - he is also Jehuti, Tahuti, Tehuti, Zehuti, Techu, Tetu, Thot, Thout, Thōout, ḏḥwty, ḏḥw) and Rosicrucianism as the later branch of it it became cleas obvious that the whole Judeo-Masonic-Yahwistic MATRIX consist from and based on these names - Osiris, Isis, Seth, Thoth, Hermes, Bacchus, Dionysus, etc. All entities and named are artificially created MATRIX. there is only one real name in this list is Osiris and in my opinion current Judeo-Yahwistic power pyramid stands on one name of one of the Old Nachash-Nagas  who’s name was Osiris (his other names are Bacchus, Dionysus, Vakha, Vakhoris, Bussiris, etc). Consequently, you may call current  Judeo-Masonic Yahwism simply – MODERRN OSIRIANISM.
This is the problem I already see in your interpretation of A.P's work.  And definitely, the creation of artificial Seth and other non-existent “Egyption” pantheon of “gods” was necessary as it was necessary the creation of Satan in Christianity and Islam.  In my opinion this is old game and old tactics of Nachash-Nagas behind YHWH.

...but,  I will post the full article about that.

P.S.

HERE IS SOME LIGHT ON OSIRIS WHO ALWAYS WAS A SECONDARY GOD IN KHEMETIC (EGYPTIAN) PANTHEON. ALL LEGENDS AND STORIES ABOUT HIS DEEDS, CREATION OF HEAVEN AND EARTH AND ALSO HUMANITY IS PURE ARTIFICIALLY CREATED STORIES BY OSIRIAN PRIESTHOOD:

Кощей   קושצ'אי   *   נָחַשׁ ‎ (nâchash)   *   नाग  (nāgá)

The origin of Nagas & Nachash and the origin of Osiris/Seth.

Look again at the neuro-lingual conteiners (roots) of the words in Slavic, Hebrew and Sanskrit and compare them:

Кощей  (COSCHEI)  קושצ'אי  *   (nâchash) נָחַשׁ  *   नाग  (nāgá)

First of all,

Word NAGA does not come from Sanskrit, it comes from Slavic Aryan (H'Aryan and Da'Aryan), it was simply recorded in Sanskrit upon arrival of H'Aryans and Da’Aryans on the Saraswati river in Indus Valley. Sanskrit itself is artificially created language (for the preservation of H'Aryan and Da'Aryan oral traditions since approximately ~603,000 BC) and derived from H'Aryan and Da'Aryan Runic  (1400 runes total). The closest language to H'Aryan and Da'Aryan currently is Russian or Old Slavic family of languages throughout the Europe. In Old Slavic the Sanskrit’s ORIGINAL word NAGAS was written as NAGI (НАГИ), with original meaning that alleged “Adam” and “Eve” (adapa race) were the "seed" and offspring of NAGAS (it is suffice to note here that all current human races are not descendants from Nagas-Nachash, except THE ORIGINAL HEBREWS – later described in Torah as the Levi (currently called Cohen) tribe which was artificially "cross-bread" to serve NAGAS-NACHASH themselves). When Bible was translated from the ORIGINAL OLD SLAVIC (H’Aryan) into alleged "ancient" Hebrew approximately in 1050 AD in Byzantium by the scribes of bloodline of Isaak Angel (Hebrew is an artificially created tongue and alphabet by NAGAS-NACHASH-COSCHEI), the neuro-lingual container of NAGAS (НАГИ) was intentionally translated and transliterated as word “NAKED”, thus changing the meaning of the original neuro-lingual container, and iwith the play on the root of the neuro-lingual container of the original word abbreviated THE OFFSPRING OF SAURIAN RACE NAGAS (НАГИ) it became to be a neuro-lingual container for the word NAKED  - all that was done for the sole purpose of hiding the original ancestry of ORIGINAL HEBREWS (Hebrew  [עִבְרִית]   means “cross-over through copulation”).

In "ancient" Hebrew (which is known only ~1000 years and the youngest of ALL "ancient" artificially created languages  - the phonetic play of the neuro-lingual container NAGI (НАГИ) was intentionally written as (ערם עירם ‛êyrôm ‛êrôm ), which also means (ערם ‎ ‛âram), - from where arrived the fictitious combined personage of A'Bram or Abraham's bloodline of Nagas-Nachash, who by the way was “the seed” and descendant of NAGAS or Shining Ones described in the legendary "Book of Enoch".

Secondly,

alleged Hebrew Nachash (נָחַשׁ ‎ nâchash) IS A COMBINATION OF TWO WORDS – NA-GA & NA-CHASH - THE FIRST PART OF THE WORD NAGA – “NA” and THE SECOND PART OF THE WORD NACHASH – “CHASH”. The neuro-lingual container of word nâchash is CHSH or SHCH.  Together it will fuse or morph two neuro-lingual containers together - “NA” and “CHASH” as “NA-CHASH”.

Both words NAGA (नाग) and NACHASH (נָחַשׁ) are describing absolutely and completely the same SEED or ANCESTRAL BLOODLINE AND THE ORIGIN OF THE FIRST CROSSBREEDS – CALLED HEBREWS, except the neuro-lingual container of NAGAS as it is in Sanskrit (NAGI) is older approximately 110,000 years than Hebrew NACHASH (נָחַשׁ).   
The origin of word nâchash is Old Slavic – Aryan. The original word and neuro-lingual container was COSCHEI (Кощей קושצ'אי) with neuro-lingual container or root CHSH or SHCH. After transliteration in/into Hebrew it became the word NHSH (נָחַשׁ) with the same neuro-lingual container as in Old Slavic and before that in Aryan. Word COSCHEI in Old Slavic is almost (with slight deviation) means exactly the same as neuro-lingual container of Sanskrit word “NAGI” and Old Slavic or Slovenic – “НАГИ”.

Simply put - two words abbreviate the entity which is Saurian in nature. As in Hebrew Torah the same entities are called NHSH (נָחַשׁ ‎ nâchash) or Shining Ones, including entity in Torah behing the Tetragrammaton called YHWH (Jehovah), also including the secondary nonetheless important god of Ek-Gipto OSIRIS who was the first seed of NAGAS in human flesh and was destroyed by Aryans.

Nevertheless, Manetho states in Manetho, Aegyptiaca., frag. 42, 1.75-79.2
that alleged priest Moses (with his brother Aaron), - one is the "law giver" and the other one "law enforcer” – both were worshipers of NACHASH-NAGAS. In addition to all Saurian story Priest Moses was Osirian priest himself continuing the NACHASH (נָחַשׁ) - NAGAS bloodline of crossbreeds and their servants.

Frankenstein.

то что у Осириса цвет кожи зеленый - это еще не значит что он рептилойд.
он же был символом возрождения и вечной жизни, т.е природы. вот и изображается зеленым.
к тому же сын Осириса - Гор. он изображается с головой сокола.
в Изиде тоже ничего земноводного нету.

Отредактировано ODES (2010-09-23 16:03:07)

axinedy,
when I said “Bible was originally written in Old Slavic”, I mean the part of Tanach that IS NOT PENTATEUCH (5 book of “Moses”). So called Torah was added to the corpus generally called today as Torah or Tanach where Torah is included. The latest evidence as confirmation to my own research was studying the works of mathematician A. Fomenko – all his books. I'd like to state THAT I DO NOT AGREE WITH ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING FOMENKO SAYS IN HIS BOOKS BY LITERALLY PUSHING HIS FINAL CONCLUSIONS AS OBVIOUS “FACTS”. In a sense he has been "advised" by rather darker type of Yahwists-kabbalists on the issues of chronology of human race, - it is very true that even toughest kabbalist and Zohar practitioner would have obvious difficulty in objective “Hebrew Torahic Chronology", which in reality is ABSOLUTE ARTIFICIAL “SCIENTIFICALLY” MASKED HOAX.
Nevertheless, in my opinion being partially a troller (intentional disinformant) himself Fomenko did a few things right, especially in area of so called Torahic chronology and Judaic history which would include “old” Hebraism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam claiming its YOUNG AGE. Yes, in comparison to the Aryan timeline and chronology Hebraic history, THE HISTORY OF CROSSBREEDING IS PRETTY YOUNG, STARTING FROM 3767 BC, This is the time when first Naga-Nachash crossbreed “Adama” was born. The problem is that “Adam” is not the father of human kind, he was special human and non-human DNA crossbreed. And that date is the beginning the story of Hebrews-crossbreeds. This same story was later compiled in Sumer, its colony Ek-Gipto, Ephiopia, Babylon-Assyria and written compilation ended in Byzantium. And this is the new timeline in his “new chronology” Fomenko describes just brilliantly in his books. Only fools do not understand what he is doing…HE IS NOT TOUCHING ARYAN – PURE HUMAN (RASA) CHRONOLOGY WHICH GOES 600,000 YEARS BACK.
The biggest mistake and fault of Fomenko’s so called "new chronology" is that he based it on...Torah-Tanach ONLY and consequently the whole Bible, making it as a GENERIC JUDEO-CHRISTIAN PLATFORM OF “HUMAN” APPEARANCE ON THE PLANETARY SCENE WITH ITS REAL HISTORY AND CIVILIZATION. He states that everything started from ADAM,  implying that biblical records and chronology are “approximately” correct. That is his main absurd and absolute genius - "paid for" research reveals black kabbalistic holes in authenticity of Judeo-Masonic Yahwistic legend that was forcefully imposed on Aryan race (RASA)..
In any case Fomenko is absolutely correct about the age of Hebrews, Judeo-Chistian paradigm of chronological Black Boxes of history, about approximate time of the writing of alleged “Hebrew” Torah, Tanach and consequently the whole Bible by dating all of them to ~1000 AD. By the way, the oldest Hebrew Tanach called Codex Leningradensis or Leningrad Codex, was compiled exactly in ~1050 AD and it was done not in current Russia (Tartaria), but in partially then ruled Byzantium by Slavs Aryans. The place of the writing "cycles" of the alleged books of the Bible Fomenko is giving correct also –  approximately ~1000 – 1250 AD Byzantium, - not current Palestine, BCE Babylon or Mesopotamia region in general, which means that Hebrews (Jews especially) are not “ancient” people, their alleged “god” is not “ancient” deity, more over - they are not even an authors of the mentioned above texts, but re-writers, re-compilers and re-interpreters.
THE ORIGINAL AUTHORS AND COMPILERS WERE ARYANS (including the main Aryan genetic bloodline – Slavs)  Another thing though, -  Fomenko has proved that part of Tanach (Bible that IS NOT PENTATEUCH) was written by Slavs Aryans, - including Psalms, all books of Prophets, the New Testament, etc WITHOUT MONOTHEISTIC BELIEFS AND YAHWISTIC DEADLY IDEOLOGY. Later on a lot of text was inserted and Original Bible was re-compiled. Re-compilation of the Bible continued further by Yahwistic Vatican till Rosicrucians took over the new “translation” under Martin Luther.
The scribes of bloodline of crossbreed and Nachash worshipper Isaak Angel (real factual personage in Byzantium), who was the High Priest of Sanhedrin at that time has re-compiled Old Slavic scrolls and texts of DAVYDS (Druids) and inserted Yahwistic (Levitic) version of Pentateuch making it the beginning of the book known today as Bible. It is very obvious and simple to understand that pro-Yahwistic cabinet of later chronology and history adjustment Jesuit Scaliger (from The Order of Jesus) re-recompiled Isaak’s version of "Slavic-Aryan Bible" several times to introduce overall history of human race tight to the alleged "Adam and Eve", "creator-god" Jehovah, Shining One Noah with his sons-crossbreeds, and all artificial package of characters-archetypes in current version of the Bible.
In today's “linguistic” disciplines persists perverted “ACCEPTED” (by who?) PARADIGM THAT  HEBREW  IS THE  OLDEST  TONGUE,  ALPHABET and consequently MONOTHEISTIC "FAITH", but even Fomenko proves that it is pure nonsense and hoax.
Hebrew derived from Akkadian, Akkadian derived from Phoenician, and Phoenician in its own right derived from Sumerian Nagas-Nachash-Anunnaki cuneiform that was an artificial substitute for the Phoenician writing, which was what is known today as THAT OLD SLAVIC-ARYAN (Phoenicians were Slavs-Aryans and Aryans).
The second accepted notion is that Old Slavic derived from Greek, but when you study the neuro-linguistics of both - Old Slavic and Greek, you will quickly find out that 90% of neuro-lingual containers of Greek language is that of Old Slavic.
So, the issue is in the following - Old Slavic is the ORIGINAL mother tongue and language of Greek and not the other way around. Please read book of JOSEPH YAHUDA “HEBREW IS GREEK” (my note – he has proved that Hebrew derived from Greek, and as I mentioned already Greek derived from Old Slavic).
The same can be easily proven with Sanskrit - Sanskrit IS NOT THE MOTHER TONGUE AND LANGUAGE OF SLAVIC (or Russian [Slavonic] family of languages, but the other way around - artificial Sanskrit tongue, language and alphabet derived from Slavic Aryan, - in this regard I absolutely agree with V. Chudinov's research - 75% of Sanskrit words have absolute Slavic neuro-lingual containers and can be easily deciphered with current modern Russian. ALL OTHER WORLD LANGUAGES WON’T DO IT !!!
From here arrives one interesting fact, - the Hebrew alphabet and tongue and language is an artificial product of the above mentioned languages and ESPECIALLY THE ORIGINAL OLD SLAVIC (or Slavonic).
Please note, when I say OLD SLAVIC, I am not talking about OLD SLAVIC “CHURCH” LANGUAGE AND INVENTED ALPHABET AFTER BLOODY  CHRISTIANIZATION OF KIEVAN RUS, but one that used to be THAT ONE LANGUAGE OF SANSKRIT RISHIS (AND ALL HUMANITY) IN ANTEDILUVIAN TIMES IN DISTANT HYPERBOREA (Da’Arya). Please read “THE ARCTIC HOME IN THE VEDAS” by Lokamanya Bâl Gangâdhar Tilak 

http://www.vaidilute.com/books/tilak/ti … tents.html

So, who wrote originally the book, called Pentateuch or Torah (originally derived from ARYAN TAROT system)? Most probably Aryans who were later known as Druids - High Priests of sunken Hyperborea, (also known as H'Aryans). The neuro-lingual container for DRUID IS “DRD” or DVD with fluctuation to root “DVT”. From this neuro-lingual root arrived the legendary and absolutely not Hebrew word DAVID or correctly title of the Priest - DAVYD.
Doing research on the subject of Torah it would be very good (if not imperative) to read work of COMYNS BEAUMONT: "Britain - the key to world history" (book is extremely difficult to find since CIA bought copyrights and refuse to publish it worldwide).
I personally disagree with Comyns' interpretation of who was the original Aryan civilization (Britts have been always rather arrogant), but if he would study Slavs and Slavic Aryan civilization he would understand that English is also artificially created tongue, language and alphabet, when the original is and always was THAT OLD SLAVIC ARYAN (Da’ARYAN  FROM  HYPERBOREA).
Despite Comyns' mistakes and problems with definitions of THE ORIGIN OF ARYAN CIVILIZATION he puts it very clear in his work, - THE ORIGINAL LOST BIBLE TEXTS WERE WRITTEN BY ARYANS, but perverted later on by Yahwistic NACHASH followers-crossbreeds of Osirian priest "Moses". They were called LEVITES (current abbreviation for the descendant DNA of that tribe is COHEN).

P.S.
On the subject of Osiris being NAGA-NACHASH-SAURIAN crossbreed please read my response to Ulis when I will post it…
But, a few things I will put here... also please see attached images below:
First three are the books needed to read for the mentioned above information. The other three images were taken in Bacchus temple, which used to be Temple of Osiris near the Temple of Ba’al (also called The Temple of Jupiter).
In addition here is an excerpt from Diodorus Siculus  “Book I (beginning)”, page 39 on Osiris:
Quote: “… Now the men of Egypt, he says, when ages ago they came into existence, as they looked up at the firmament and were struck with both awe and wonder at the nature of the universe, conceived that two gods were both eternal and first, namely, the sun and the moon, whom they called respectively Osiris and Isis, these appellations having in each case been based upon a certain meaning in them. 12. For when the names are translated into Greek Osiris means "many-eyed," and properly so; for in shedding his rays in every direction he survives with many eyes, as it were, all land and sea. And the words of the poet are also in agreement with this conception when he says: The sun, who sees all things and hears all things. And of the ancient Greek writers of mythology some give to Osiris the name Dionysus or, with a slight change in form, Sirius. One of them, Eumolpus, in his Bacchic Hymn speaks of Our Dionysus, shining like a star,
With fiery eye in every ray; while Orpheus says: And this is why men call him Shining One And Dionysus…” End quote.

Note: every serious scholar knows that Dionysus is Bacchus and consequently Bacchus is Osiris, he is also Ea or Enki and there is sufficient information that alleged Osirion in Abydos is the place where Ea/Enki rests. Also it is known that Enki was Anunnaki Saurian crossbreed, so was Osiris…
Here is quote from the same book of Diodorus Siculus  “Book I (beginning)” about “mysterious” birth of Osiris (not of Aryan bloodline), pages 74-75:

Quote:
“…4. Cadmus, who was a citizen of Egyptian Thebes, begat several children, of whom one was Semelê; she was violated by an unknown person, became pregnant, and after seven months gave birth to a child whose appearance was such as the Egyptians hold had been that of Osiris. Now such a child is not usually brought into the world alive, either because it is contrary to the will of the gods or because the law of nature does not admit of it. 5. But when Cadmus found out what had taken place, having at the same time a reply from an oracle commanding him to observe the laws of his fathers, he both gilded the infant and paid it the appropriate sacrifices, on the ground that there had been a sort of epiphany of Osiris among men. 6. The fatherhood of the child he attributed to Zeus, in this way magnifying Osiris and averting slander from his violated daughter; and this is the reason why the tale was given out among the Greeks to the effect that Semelê, the daughter of Cadmus, was the mother of Osiris by Zeus…” End quote.

Please note that described above birth of Osiris is not as Aryan King but typical for the concealment of crossbreeding. From here derived all following IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONS in Judaism, Christianity and Islam…All these three – Judaism, Christianity and Islam are Old Osirianism 
 
Frankenstein.

Отредактировано Frankenstein (2010-09-24 08:42:17)

Мер-физическое тело,Ка-метальное тело,Ба-астральное тело. Витрувианский человек

Ulis,

with all respect to you I think you misunderstood what I said and misinterpreted a few things.

I did not compare MODERN YIDISH word COHEN with the neuro-lingual container N*CHSH per se, - the word COHEN (or KOHEN - Savior, Messiah, Priest, and Prophet ) is made up modern transliteration of what word PRIEST meant and was written as in Hebrew.

The word was נָחַשׁ , where without vowels THE NEURO-LINGUAL CONTAINER OF IT (IN HEBREW) was N*SHCH exactly the same as K*SHCH (koschei).

What I said was - that THE WORD ITSELF (the neuro-lingual container of it) came into Hebrew from the other language (which definitely points to Slavic [Aryan]) and means exactly the same - SHCH in Slavic and mirrored CHSH in Hebrew. Since there is no any other identical neuro-lingual root in any other language, you can observe the derivation of the meaning that was transferred from one linguistic root to another NOT CHANGED.

You know that all Magik starts from the neuro-linguistic thought form, the same happened with the programming of the profane…The meaning of “Cohen” is that case…

And yes, Levites were servants of the NCHSH – YHWH cult and were called as נָחַשׁ . The long searched for “seed of Cohens” in modern genealogy (Lebedev’s work) abbreviates the ancestral “Hebrew” Cohen line to the “tribe” of Levi (Levites).

Other than that we are on one page - breath the same "air" and warm ourselves with the same "fire".

I am reading a lot of your posts and comments to the articles written by others...and really enjoy them, you are one who “knows his stuff”.

I would like to get familiar with your thought form by reading the rest of the posts and will add my objections in relation to some details you gave in "Ruslan and Ludmila", especially to Berosus’ Kings List, Manetho's works, etc in regards to Osiris and Seth.

F.